Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 09:21
Thank you.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Feather-legged lace weaver spider kills prey by covering it with toxic silk - Phys.org
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Nemo cumque quis qui velit unde nihil.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What’s next?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
For 9 Days, Earth Was Sending Out Mysterious Signals. Now We Know What They Were. - Yahoo
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Tesla after Trump - Financial Times
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Who is Meghan Markle and why is she so controversial on the Internet?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What should every American know before traveling to the UK?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Russia can stop this any time.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Answering the Nintendo Switch 2’s lingering accessibility questions - The Verge